<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sandy Hutchens Ripoff Reporting&#187; Sandy Hutchens Ripoff Reporting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sandyhutchensripoffreporting.com/category/internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sandyhutchensripoffreporting.com</link>
	<description>Sandy Hutchens and his expert team of rip-off reporters expose frauds and scams found in our businesses in our communities and in our personal lives.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:04:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Tagged Contacts Ripoff Reporting!!! Claims Resolution with Attorney General!!! Did Tagged Really Resolve it???</title>
		<link>http://sandyhutchensripoffreporting.com/2010/01/tagged-contacts-ripoff-reporting-claims-resolution-with-attorney-general-did-tagged-really-resolve-it/</link>
		<comments>http://sandyhutchensripoffreporting.com/2010/01/tagged-contacts-ripoff-reporting-claims-resolution-with-attorney-general-did-tagged-really-resolve-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Hutchens</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[address books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e mail address]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invitations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york attorney general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[november 14]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private message]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private messages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ripoff Reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snopes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tagged]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tagged com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandyhutchensripoffreporting.com/?p=162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tagged.com sent us the following comment:
We at Tagged would like to clarify, for you and your readers, that this matter has been resolved with the New York Attorney General and there will be no lawsuit.
Tagged regrets the confusion some experienced with our email invitation campaign in early June of 2009, that resulted in some complaints. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4>Tagged.com sent us the following comment:</h4>
<blockquote><p>We at Tagged would like to clarify, for you and your readers, that this matter has been resolved with the New York Attorney General and there will be no lawsuit.</p>
<p>Tagged regrets the confusion some experienced with our email invitation campaign in early June of 2009, that resulted in some complaints. We immediately addressed the issue and cooperated fully with the NYAG office.</p>
<p>Tagged has completely revamped our invitation process, used by all social networks, to make it the clearest in the industry. Everyday millions of people around the world enjoy interacting with our site and we are committed to ensuring people have a positive experience with Tagged.</p>
<p>If you would like to read more about the situation and our settlement please visit The Tagged Blog and this post: http://blog.tagged.com/?p=193. Thank you</p></blockquote>
<h4>We direct your attention to the analysis at Snopes.com!</h4>
<p><strong>NOTE THAT THE TAGGED BLOG POST IS DATED NOVEMBER 9, 2009. THE SNOPES ARTICLE WAS LAST UPDATED NOVEMBER 14, 2009 WHICH IS FIVE DAYS LATER!!!</strong></p>
<p><strong>Snopes</strong> says that YES there was <strong>deceptiveness</strong> by <strong>Tagged.com</strong> or <strong>Tagged</strong>.</p>
<p>Tagged.com is a <strong>social networking site</strong> which has been around since 2004. </p>
<p>Its current registration process asks applicants to supply an e-mail address and a password for accessing the corresponding e-mail account so Tagged can &#8220;match you up with your friends,&#8221; information which the company apparently uses to traverse address books (or other e-mail contacts) and send e-mailed invitations to the addresses found there &mdash; invitations like the ones noted above, which deceptively appear to have been sent by the Tagged members themselves and claim that the recipients have been &#8220;added as a friend,&#8221; &#8220;sent photos&#8221; or &#8220;sent a private message&#8221; on Tagged (even though no deliberate &#8220;adding&#8221; has taken place, nor have any photos or private messages for the recipients been posted for viewing).</p>
<p>An April 2007 eWeek <A HREF="http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Security/Harvesting-Teenagers/" TARGET=tagged>article</A> describes and verifies Tagged&#8217;s disingenuous e-mail generation process, and McAfee SiteAdvisor <A HREF="http://www.siteadvisor.com/sites/tagged.com" TARGET=mcafee>entry</A> for Tagged.com has logged numerous complaints about the practice.  </p>
<p>Tagged.com&#8217;s current terms of service (<A HREF="http://www.tagged.com/terms_of_service.html" TARGET=tagged>TOS</A>) now include the following disclaimer acknowledging that its members&#8217; personal information may be used for the purpose of &#8220;initiating commercial e-mail messages&#8221; (i.e. sending</NOBR> spam):</p>
<p>E) Notice Regarding Commercial Email</p>
<p>MEMBERS CONSENT TO RECEIVE COMMERCIAL E-MAIL MESSAGES FROM TAGGED, AND ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE THAT THEIR EMAIL ADDRESSES AND OTHER PERSONAL INFORMATION MAY BE USED BY TAGGED FOR THE PURPOSE OF INITIATING COMMERCIAL E-MAIL MESSAGES.</p>
<p>In November 2009, tagged.com was ordered to pay $500,000 in penalties and costs to the state of New York and $250,000 in penalties and costs to Texas. </p>
<p>Tagged CEO Greg Tseng said the 5-year-old company had voluntarily proposed reforms and overhauled its registration process. It also planned to add more privacy features. However, the company has failed to admit any wrongdoing.</p>
<h2>Last updated: 14 November 2009</h2>
<p>Evidence of&#8230;.?</p>
<p><strong>Social Network Tagged.com Being Sued for Identity Theft</strong> (video)<br />
<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/yS2pyk-B6II&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;color1=0x234900&#038;color2=0x4e9e00"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/yS2pyk-B6II&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;color1=0x234900&#038;color2=0x4e9e00" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></p>
<p>New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo has charged that social-networking service Tagged.com stole the identities of more than 60 million Internet users by sending e-mails that raided their private accounts. Cuomo says he plans to sue the site for deceptive marketing and invasion of privacy. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sandyhutchensripoffreporting.com/2010/01/tagged-contacts-ripoff-reporting-claims-resolution-with-attorney-general-did-tagged-really-resolve-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Internet Identity Scam</title>
		<link>http://sandyhutchensripoffreporting.com/2010/01/another-internet-identity-scam/</link>
		<comments>http://sandyhutchensripoffreporting.com/2010/01/another-internet-identity-scam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Hutchens</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rip-Off]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ripoff Repoting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandyhutchensripoffreporting.com/?p=156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New York&#8217;s attorney general says that Tagged.com stole the identities of more than 60 million internet users by sending emails that raided their private accounts.
Many are now planing to sue the social networking website for deceptive marketing and invasion of privacy.
Consumers had their privacy invaded and were forced into the embarrassing position of having to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>New York&#8217;s attorney general says that Tagged.com stole the identities of more than 60 million internet users by sending emails that raided their private accounts.</h3>
<p>Many are now planing to sue the social networking website for deceptive marketing and invasion of privacy.<br />
Consumers had their privacy invaded and were forced into the embarrassing position of having to apologise to all their email contacts for Tagged illegal  behaviour.</p>
<p>Started in 2004 by Harvard math students Greg Tseng and Johann Schleier-Smith, Tagged calls itself a &#8220;premier social-networking destination.&#8221; The California-based company claims to be the third-largest social networking site after Facebook and MySpace, with 80 million registered users.</p>
<p>Tagged may have acquired many of them fraudulently, sending unsuspecting recipients emails that urged them to view private photos posted by friends.The message read: &#8220;(name of friend) sent you photos on Tagged.&#8221;<br />
When recipients tried to access the photos, they could in effect become new members of the site</p>
<p>The system was set up so that a user was asked whether the sender of the photos was a friend, then suggesting that if the recipient didn&#8217;t respond, the friend &#8220;may think you said no&#8221; (accompanied by a sad face icon). Every person on a user&#8217;s contact list received an email that again read, &#8220;(name of user) sent you photos on Tagged.&#8221; The site then released a flood of offers for everything from sweepstakes to other services.</p>
<p>The attorney general said a lawsuit would seek to stop Tagged from engaging in &#8220;fraudulent practices&#8221; and to seek fines.  Plans to sue the social networking website for deceptive marketing and invasion of privacy are definitely in the works.</p>
<p>If you or anyone you Know have more information on this scam please leave us a comment on Sandy Hutchens Ripoff Repoting.<br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/yS2pyk-B6II&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/yS2pyk-B6II&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sandyhutchensripoffreporting.com/2010/01/another-internet-identity-scam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tech Support Rip-off Report</title>
		<link>http://sandyhutchensripoffreporting.com/2009/09/tech-support-rip-off/</link>
		<comments>http://sandyhutchensripoffreporting.com/2009/09/tech-support-rip-off/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 20:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Hutchens</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rip-Off]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sandy hutchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard disk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hefty price tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motherboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rip off report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scammers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[support businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technical expertise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv reporter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandyhutchensripoffreporting.com/?p=106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;This article is just one of many you can find about Tech Support scammers that will blow your mind&#8221; said Sandy Hutchens &#8220;the Rip-off Report  team will closely look in to this and other related scams in the Tech Support industry.&#8221; Also check out this video of another report by The National.
A TV reporter took [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This article is just one of many you can find about Tech Support scammers that will blow your mind&#8221; said Sandy Hutchens &#8220;the Rip-off Report  team will closely look in to this and other related scams in the Tech Support industry.&#8221; Also check out this video of another report by The National.</p>
<p>A TV reporter took a bunch of working PC’s, had them checked over by an expert to make sure nothing was wrong with them, and then unplugged each computer’s IDE cable and dropped them off at various tech-support businesses.  Now, if you’re not computer savvy, let me explain this. To anyone who has ever opened up a PC case, an unplugged IDE cable is as obvious to diagnose as trying to work out why a bucket with a gaping hole in the bottom won’t hold water.  The second thing is how easy this is to fix. Ever plugged a TV into an electrical outlet? That’s about the technical expertise involved. It’s literally putting a square peg in the square hole.  The point I’m trying to make here is that there is absolutely no way that anyone who has any experience at all with computers could possibly miss this problem.  However, that didn’t stop “Geek Squad” from saying it was a power supply issue, and trying to sell the reporter a new PSU, along with a hefty price tag for a ‘labor’ involved.  Again, I have no idea how they could have arrived at this diagnosis. If the power supply wasn’t working, the computer wouldn’t start up at all, instead of starting up but failing to boot.  Another place said that the motherboard was “half bad”.  Just to add further insult to injury, the IDE cable is what connects the Hard drive to the motherboard. When they turn the computer on “Primary Hard Disk Drive not found” appears on the screen. This tells you one of four things is wrong.  A) The Hard Drive is faulty and needs to be replaced.  B) The IDE cable is damaged and needs to be replaced.  C) The IDE cable has come unplugged.  D) The jumpers on the drive are set incorrectly.  So how the hell “Geek Squad” diagnosed a power supply problem, and another said it as a motherboard problem is beyond me. Technically it could be a motherboard problem, but you would definitely check the IDE cables first.  Just like when a car stops unexpectedly and won’t start up again, the first thing you check is that it’s not out of gas. Plus, when a headlight stops working, if you took it to a garage to get the bulb replaced, you wouldn’t expect them to tell you that your headlight isn’t working because your entire transmission needs replacing  However, the thing that honestly shocked me was that only one place they took a computer to simply re-plugged the IDE cable and handed it back. I mean, the prices charged where simply outrageous. The “half-bad motherboard” guy tried to charge $275, and there wasn’t a single price quoted that was under a hundred dollars.  A hundred dollars to plug in an IDE cable? Are you shitting me?  I can honestly say that if I worked in any of these places, and someone gave me a computer with an unplugged IDE cable, not only would I notice the problem within seconds of opening the case, I’d plug it back in, and just give it back to the customer.  If I had to quote a “fair price” for it, they’d owe me a single cent…and that’s only because there’s no such thing as a half cent piece.  It honestly makes me sad that so-called “experts” can be this dumb, or that it appears to be standard practice to rip off unsuspecting customers and charge them an arm and a leg to “repair” such a simple problem.  Now here’s the thing, and the best advice I can give to any new computer user. Find a friend who knows a little about computers, and get them to give you a tour of the inside of your computer case.  Honestly, it may be intimidating at first, but I promise you that I can show anyone how a computer works in less than half an hour. For the most part, most modern PC’s are simply a case of matching color coded connectors, and placing the “square peg in the square hole”.  Let me let you in on a big secret. Computers are easy. At least for the things an average user will need to do.  Think of it this way, you don’t have to understand exactly how an engine works to operate an automobile. You just need to know the controls, where the gas goes and how to check your oil and a few other things. It’s the same with computers.  Unfortunately, the PC Repair industry is based on maintaining the myth that it takes a genius to understand how to fix a computer.  However, let me give you an example of how easy it can be.  Say you want to fit some more memory in your computer. First, check the manual that came with your PC to see what type of memory your computer uses before you go to buy it. Then, go buy your memory.  Then, pop off the side of your computer’s case, and look on the motherboard (that’s the big main circuit board inside your machine that everything else is connected to), and look for the memory slot. (Again, this can be found easily in your manual, but essentially you’re looking at a square foot of real estate for something that looked exactly like the memory stick you’re holding in your hand, it shouldn’t be too hard).  Then, put the memory in the slot (It has cutouts on the memory stick, so it can only fit one way), and push down firmly until it clicks into place.  Congrats! You’re done!  Now, just to highlight my point, this is an operation that will take a couple of minutes, tops…and it’s yet another example of the “put the square peg in the square hole” level of difficulty.  However, if you went to Best Buy and got “Geek Squad” to do it for you, you’d find yourself paying about $160 for the privilege of not spending 2 minutes pushing a memory stick into a<br />
slot.<br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/sC-JX249fPs&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/sC-JX249fPs&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sandyhutchensripoffreporting.com/2009/09/tech-support-rip-off/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Work at Home Rip-Off Scams</title>
		<link>http://sandyhutchensripoffreporting.com/2009/08/work-at-home-rip-off-scams/</link>
		<comments>http://sandyhutchensripoffreporting.com/2009/08/work-at-home-rip-off-scams/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 14:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Hutchens</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rip-Off]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[check references]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial success]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home directories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job listings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legitimacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legitimate employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legitimate job]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[timely manner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work at home job]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work at home jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work from home job]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[working at home]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandyhutchensripoffreporting.com/?p=45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Sandy Hutchens is often asked how  to tell whether a work from home job posting is a scam or a legitimate job. There are signs to look for he said. In addition, there are sites that can help you determine what&#8217;s a real work at home job and what isn&#8217;t.The better business bureau is a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/vkOzPlPYCnI&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/vkOzPlPYCnI&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Sandy Hutchens is often asked how  to tell whether a work from home job posting is a scam or a legitimate job. There are signs to look for he said. In addition, there are sites that can help you determine what&#8217;s a real work at home job and what isn&#8217;t.The better business bureau is a good place to start <a href="http://www.bbb.org/">www.bbb.org</a></p>
<p>Scams can also be an issue when looking for jobs that don&#8217;t involve working at home. Job sites try to police the listings, but, it&#8217;s hard to catch all the bad listings in a timely manner. Be careful when reviewing postings to make sure that you&#8217;re not taken advantage of by unscrupulous job posters.</p>
<h3>Evaluating Job Listings</h3>
<p><strong>Check Out the Job Listings </strong><br />
If it isn&#8217;t listed in the job posting, find out if there&#8217;s a salary or if you&#8217;re paid on commission. For work at home jobs, ask how often are you paid and how you are paid. Ask what equipment (hardware / software) you need to provide.</p>
<p><strong>You Won&#8217;t Get Rich Quick (Really)</strong><br />
Avoid listings that guarantee you wealth, financial success, or that will help you get rich fast. Stay clear of listings that offer you high income for part-time hours. They will do none of the above.</p>
<p><strong>Hang on to Your Money</strong><br />
Do not send money! Legitimate employers don&#8217;t charge to hire you or to get you started. Don&#8217;t send money for work at home directories or start-up kits.</p>
<p><strong>Check References</strong><br />
Ask for references if you&#8217;re not sure about the company&#8217;s legitimacy. Request a list of other employees or contractors to find out how this has worked for them. Then contact the references to ask how this is working out. If the company isn&#8217;t willing to provide references (names, email addresses and phone numbers) do not consider the opportunity.</p>
<p><strong> Think Twice</strong><br />
If it sounds too good to be true, you can be sure it is! Also, read any &#8220;offers&#8221; you get very carefully. One candidate for employment got a very detailed job offer from an employer. The only problem was that she hadn&#8217;t applied for the job and buried deep within the lines was a request for her bank account information, so the employer could pay her. It was a scam, of course, but with some of the well-written ones it can be hard to tell.</p>
<h3>Work at Home Jobs To Avoid</h3>
<p><strong>Assembly Jobs</strong> &#8211; No, you can&#8217;t make lots of money assembling craft kits or any other type of kits. You can waste money on a package to get you started though.</p>
<p><strong>Data Entry Jobs</strong> &#8211; You&#8217;ll see lots of listings for data entry jobs. They are usually either positions posting ads or a sales pitch for a kit that will get you started.</p>
<p><strong>Multi-Level Marketing</strong> (MLM) which involves recruiting new people, and more new people, to sell the product. If all you are doing is trying to find more people to do what you&#8217;re doing, keep in mind that there are probably thousands of other people attempting to do the same thing. Most of them aren&#8217;t getting rich. Also note, that MLM isn&#8217;t a job with a paycheck &#8211; it&#8217;s starting a business, with no guarantees.</p>
<p><strong>Online Businesses</strong> &#8211; Do you want to start your own online business and get rich? Be very wary of these type of ads too. What you will do is end up paying for a guide to working at home which duplicates information you can find free.</p>
<p><strong>Posting Ads</strong> &#8211; There are lots of ads saying workers are needed to post ads on online bulletin boards and forums. You don&#8217;t get paid to post, rather you may get paid if other people sign-up.</p>
<p><strong>Processing Claims</strong> &#8211; In order to get &#8220;hired&#8221; you&#8217;ll need to buy equipment, software and pay for training.</p>
<p><strong>Stuffing Envelopes</strong> &#8211; Believe it, or not, there are still people saying that you can earn $3 or $4 per envelope to stuff them. You can&#8217;t. All major companies have postage machines which stuff, sort and meter mail.</p>
<p>The winner in the scam contest are the sites that offer to sell provide you with information on only legitimate work at home jobs &#8211; for a nominal fee, of course. Don&#8217;t do it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sandyhutchensripoffreporting.com/2009/08/work-at-home-rip-off-scams/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

