<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sandy Hutchens Ripoff Reporting&#187; Sandy Hutchens Ripoff Reporting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sandyhutchensripoffreporting.com/tag/invitation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sandyhutchensripoffreporting.com</link>
	<description>Sandy Hutchens and his expert team of rip-off reporters expose frauds and scams found in our businesses in our communities and in our personal lives.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:04:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Tagged Contacts Ripoff Reporting!!! Claims Resolution with Attorney General!!! Did Tagged Really Resolve it???</title>
		<link>http://sandyhutchensripoffreporting.com/2010/01/tagged-contacts-ripoff-reporting-claims-resolution-with-attorney-general-did-tagged-really-resolve-it/</link>
		<comments>http://sandyhutchensripoffreporting.com/2010/01/tagged-contacts-ripoff-reporting-claims-resolution-with-attorney-general-did-tagged-really-resolve-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Hutchens</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[address books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e mail address]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invitations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york attorney general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[november 14]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private message]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private messages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ripoff Reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snopes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tagged]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tagged com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandyhutchensripoffreporting.com/?p=162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tagged.com sent us the following comment:
We at Tagged would like to clarify, for you and your readers, that this matter has been resolved with the New York Attorney General and there will be no lawsuit.
Tagged regrets the confusion some experienced with our email invitation campaign in early June of 2009, that resulted in some complaints. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4>Tagged.com sent us the following comment:</h4>
<blockquote><p>We at Tagged would like to clarify, for you and your readers, that this matter has been resolved with the New York Attorney General and there will be no lawsuit.</p>
<p>Tagged regrets the confusion some experienced with our email invitation campaign in early June of 2009, that resulted in some complaints. We immediately addressed the issue and cooperated fully with the NYAG office.</p>
<p>Tagged has completely revamped our invitation process, used by all social networks, to make it the clearest in the industry. Everyday millions of people around the world enjoy interacting with our site and we are committed to ensuring people have a positive experience with Tagged.</p>
<p>If you would like to read more about the situation and our settlement please visit The Tagged Blog and this post: http://blog.tagged.com/?p=193. Thank you</p></blockquote>
<h4>We direct your attention to the analysis at Snopes.com!</h4>
<p><strong>NOTE THAT THE TAGGED BLOG POST IS DATED NOVEMBER 9, 2009. THE SNOPES ARTICLE WAS LAST UPDATED NOVEMBER 14, 2009 WHICH IS FIVE DAYS LATER!!!</strong></p>
<p><strong>Snopes</strong> says that YES there was <strong>deceptiveness</strong> by <strong>Tagged.com</strong> or <strong>Tagged</strong>.</p>
<p>Tagged.com is a <strong>social networking site</strong> which has been around since 2004. </p>
<p>Its current registration process asks applicants to supply an e-mail address and a password for accessing the corresponding e-mail account so Tagged can &#8220;match you up with your friends,&#8221; information which the company apparently uses to traverse address books (or other e-mail contacts) and send e-mailed invitations to the addresses found there &mdash; invitations like the ones noted above, which deceptively appear to have been sent by the Tagged members themselves and claim that the recipients have been &#8220;added as a friend,&#8221; &#8220;sent photos&#8221; or &#8220;sent a private message&#8221; on Tagged (even though no deliberate &#8220;adding&#8221; has taken place, nor have any photos or private messages for the recipients been posted for viewing).</p>
<p>An April 2007 eWeek <A HREF="http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Security/Harvesting-Teenagers/" TARGET=tagged>article</A> describes and verifies Tagged&#8217;s disingenuous e-mail generation process, and McAfee SiteAdvisor <A HREF="http://www.siteadvisor.com/sites/tagged.com" TARGET=mcafee>entry</A> for Tagged.com has logged numerous complaints about the practice.  </p>
<p>Tagged.com&#8217;s current terms of service (<A HREF="http://www.tagged.com/terms_of_service.html" TARGET=tagged>TOS</A>) now include the following disclaimer acknowledging that its members&#8217; personal information may be used for the purpose of &#8220;initiating commercial e-mail messages&#8221; (i.e. sending</NOBR> spam):</p>
<p>E) Notice Regarding Commercial Email</p>
<p>MEMBERS CONSENT TO RECEIVE COMMERCIAL E-MAIL MESSAGES FROM TAGGED, AND ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE THAT THEIR EMAIL ADDRESSES AND OTHER PERSONAL INFORMATION MAY BE USED BY TAGGED FOR THE PURPOSE OF INITIATING COMMERCIAL E-MAIL MESSAGES.</p>
<p>In November 2009, tagged.com was ordered to pay $500,000 in penalties and costs to the state of New York and $250,000 in penalties and costs to Texas. </p>
<p>Tagged CEO Greg Tseng said the 5-year-old company had voluntarily proposed reforms and overhauled its registration process. It also planned to add more privacy features. However, the company has failed to admit any wrongdoing.</p>
<h2>Last updated: 14 November 2009</h2>
<p>Evidence of&#8230;.?</p>
<p><strong>Social Network Tagged.com Being Sued for Identity Theft</strong> (video)<br />
<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/yS2pyk-B6II&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;color1=0x234900&#038;color2=0x4e9e00"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/yS2pyk-B6II&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;color1=0x234900&#038;color2=0x4e9e00" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></p>
<p>New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo has charged that social-networking service Tagged.com stole the identities of more than 60 million Internet users by sending e-mails that raided their private accounts. Cuomo says he plans to sue the site for deceptive marketing and invasion of privacy. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sandyhutchensripoffreporting.com/2010/01/tagged-contacts-ripoff-reporting-claims-resolution-with-attorney-general-did-tagged-really-resolve-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
